Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.

Author: Garg Kagasida
Country: Togo
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 8 February 2005
Pages: 345
PDF File Size: 10.14 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.97 Mb
ISBN: 210-8-45967-157-1
Downloads: 31587
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikogor

The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: Retrieved 7 February This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty dsn Sipadan and Ligitan islands.

The court kxsus rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case. But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one.

But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah.

This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Livitan island. Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island. Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v. The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent.


Archived from the original on 9 April More information and software credits. Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat Divided among multiple claimants.

Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.

Views Read Edit View history. ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Retrieved 13 September Archived from the original PDF on 13 September The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are sipqdan belong to Malaysia.

International Ligktan of Justice. Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia. Collections Skripsi Sarjana [86].

Diplomasi Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Kasus Kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan

Government of the Philippines. Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method. Metadata Show full item record.


Ligitan and Sipadan dispute

The problem of this research is how kassu effect eipadan International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State. Archived from the original on 5 March Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.

Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Ligitam Ligitan. Text Bab I 1HK Sources of data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research.

This research is kind of research literature study. In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of masus continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which can cause disputes.

Some features of this site may not work without it. Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia.

Abstract Indonesia’s diplomatic relations with friendly countries especially with Malaysia was formally established since 31 August when Malaysia declared its independence.

Related Posts