Mauro Andrade de Sousa and Alcides Antonio dos Santos . fidence interval ( Vuolo, ), a type B variance of half . Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros. Journal of Im-. munological Methods, 7. Vuolo JH (). Fundamentos da Teoria. dos Erros. 2nd edn. Editora Edgard Blü-. cher Ltda., São Paulo. 8. N.H. Medina, J.H. Vuolo. Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas (C6) da Universidade Vale do Rio dos .. [Vu96] J.R. Vuolo, Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros, 2nd Ed., Edgar Blücher.

Author: Shaktiran Dajin
Country: Peru
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 5 March 2014
Pages: 32
PDF File Size: 5.58 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.27 Mb
ISBN: 521-7-97151-141-4
Downloads: 44594
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Galkis

On the meaning of coverage probabilities, Metrologia 46 6: Difficulties arising from the representation of the measurand by a probability distribution, Measurement Science and Technology 21 1: Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.

Sebastian Yuri Cavalcanti Catunda.

The specification of rules for rejecting too variance a product, with particular reference to an electric lamp problem, J. Principles of probability and statistics for metrology, Metrologia Copulas for uncertainty analysis, Metrologia 47 3: The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal, Biometrika On using the Monte Carlo fundamento to calculate uncertainty intervals, Metrologia 43 6: All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

* Metodologia Científica (FIS) – droqueh

Calculation of uncertainty in the presence of prior knowledge, Metrologia 44 2: The propagation of uncertainty with calibration equations, Measurement Science and Technology 18 7: The evaluation of the uncertainty in knowing a directly measured quantity, Measurement Science and Technology 9 8: Contudo, a escolha da Eq.

The main method recognized by the metrologists for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is de facto the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ISO Guide. No artigo de Esward et al. Type B uncertainty in sound power measurements using comparison method, Measurement Martins I ; Ricardo A.


Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty

Rubinstein ; Siepmann et al. Dessa forma, a Eq.

On use of Bayesian statistics to make the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement consistent, Metrologia 40 5: A Bayesian approach to information fusion for evaluating the measurement uncertainty, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57 3: Os valores simulados Eq. Furthermore, a comparative rundamentos between these two methods was carried out in two case studies. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty and errod numerical calculation by a Monte Carlo method, Measurement Science and Fudamentos 19 8: Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with a measurement result not corrected for systematic effects, Measurement Science and Technology 9 6: An outline of supplement 1 to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement on numerical methods for the propagation of distributions, Measurement Techniques 48 4: Bayesian Statistics2nd edn, Oxford University Press.

O primeiro termo da Eq. How to cite this article. Standard uncertainty in each measurement result explicit or implicit, Measurement 20 2: Does “WelchSatterthwaite”make vullo good uncertainty estimate?

Vuolo J. H. – Fundamentos da teoria de erros.pdf

We review the literature, in particular the main papers presenting these modern approaches. Limitations of the Welch-Satterthwaite approximation for measurement uncertainty calculations, Metrologia 37 1: Services on Demand Journal.

Nonlinear models and best estimates in the GUM, Metrologia 43 4: A Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation implemented on a distributed computing system, Metrologia 44 5: The obtained results show that it is necessary to evaluate the influence of the degree of non linearity in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty before either method is chosen. The present paper discusses these methods for the quantification of measurement uncertainty. Higher order corrections to the Welch-Satterthwaite formula, Metrologia 42 5: Model-based measurement uncertainty evaluation, with applications in testing, Accred Qual Assur 8: Evolution of modern approaches to express uncertainty in measurement, Metrologia 44 6: Systematic approach to the modelling of measurements for uncertainty evaluation, Metrologia 43 4: Estimation of the uncertainty of indirect measurements from the propagation of distributions by using the Monte-Carlo method: Mathematical method for physicists6 edn, New York: Trapezoidal and triangular distributions for Type B evaluation of standard uncertainty, Metrologia 44 2: Basic and general concepts and associated terms VIM.


Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the presence of combined random and analogue-todigital conversion errors, Measurement Science and Technology 11 9: Evaluation of uncertainty in measurements based on digitized data, Measurement 32 4: The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty, Metrologia The evaluation of standard uncertainty in the presence of limited resolution of indicating devices, Measurement Science and Technology 8 4: Bayesian evaluation of comparison data, Metrologia 43 4: An Introduction to uncertainty in MeasurementNew York: A computer program for a general case evaluation of the expanded uncertainty, Accred Qual Assur 8: Expressions of second and third order uncertainty with third and fourth moments, Measurement 41 6: A generalization of the Welch-Satterthwaite formula for use with correlated uncertainty components, Metrologia 44 5: Como mostrado nas Eqs.

Related Posts